Design

The HT3550 exudes sophisticated elegance. It's small but not too little, which makes it ideal for residential configurations without garnering too much notice. The black and bronze color combination is excellent and fits most living room décor. Moving a projector about is not the simplest chore, however; it is not the lightest one available. One user said that while a ceiling mount looks great, manual adjustment of it is a little difficult. Though it has a more neutral, silver finish, the W2700 follows a similar technique. Some individuals like this as it fits better in minimalist environments and is less ostentative. One drawback is its lack of stability compared to the HT3550. A few consumers claimed that the lens cover is fragile and difficult to work with. On the other hand, it's quite smaller, therefore arranging it on a coffee table or carrying it between rooms is rather simpler.

Although both look fantastic, the HT3550 feels more luxurious and robust. For mobility and refinement, the W2700 triumphs Should you be putting it up permanently, the HT3550 could be preferable. Choose the W2700 for sporadic usage or a more elegant look.

Connectivity

The HT3550 has two HDMI 2.0 connectors, a USB port, and an audio-out port. Usually, connecting to most devices is easy. Its fit with 4K streaming devices like Apple TV and Fire Stick is one that consumers often commended. Said otherwise, several users felt constrained by the absence of extra USB ports for peripheral connection. Furthermore absent is Bluetooth, hence lacking wireless audio hookups. If you use Bluetooth headphones or speakers, it may be unfortunate. With HDMI 2.0, USB, and audio out, the W2700 offers essentially the same connectivity as the HT3550. Still, it offers something the HT3550 lacks: USB-C. For consumers of current laptops or tablets mostly dependent on USB-C connectors, this made a significant impact. Bluetooth isn't available, which lets down consumers looking for a wireless sound configuration such as with the HT3550.

The USB-C connector of the W2700 gives it a little advantage. But both projectors run around the same if USB-C isn't something you'll need. Just bear in mind that none offers Bluetooth, so arrange your audio setup differently.

Performance 

The HT3550 shines in this area. Designed for movie buffs, it has outstanding color accuracy and deep blacks that accentuate movies. Watching a wildlife program seemed to one user like "seeing the world through fresh eyes." HDR material seems brilliant and the 4K resolution is sharp. For fast-paced gameplay, nevertheless, players reported considerable input latency, which lessens optimum conditions. Another criticism was the fan noise, which was not too loud but somewhat obvious in slower sequences.

Although the W2700 performs rather well, its orientation is more toward adaptability. Though less cinematic than in the HT3550, the colors are vivid. For mixed use—sports, gaming, and casual streaming among other things—this makes it ideal. One user called the projector flexible. Gamers will like the less input latency than that of the HT3550. With certain scenes being washed out, it does not handle HDR content either, either. Though some customers claimed it's somewhat quieter, the fan noise is like the HT3550.

Movie buffs seeking a real home theater experience would find the HT3550 ideal. For mixed use, particularly if you want to often game or see sports, the W2700 is best. The HT3550 is the obvious champion if HDR is your first concern.

Where and When to Use

In dim rooms, this projector shines. Those who have specialized home theaters or those who can properly adjust lighting will find it a favorite. One user reported turning their basement into a small movie theater. It's not ideal for daylight usage unless you have blackout curtains; however, it suffers in bright surroundings. More flexibility comes with the W2700. For living rooms or areas where you cannot block out sunlight, it is bright enough for semi-lit rooms and is a superior option. One reviewer said they have easy family movie evenings in the living room. Said another way, direct sunlight still isn't perfect.

Look for the HT3550 if you have a dark, devoted area. The W2700 is the superior choice in a multi-use living room arrangement.

Compatible devices

Projectors perform well with game consoles, streaming sticks, computers, and Blu-ray players, among other devices. Users underlined how simple it is to become connected to well-known choices like Fire TV and Roku. The USB-C connector of the W2700 distinguishes it most and increases its future-proofness for more recent laptops and tablets. If you depend on USB-C devices, the W2700 will save you from purchasing numerous adapters.

Ease of Use

Although setting up the HT3550 is easy, it takes some time to adjust parameters for optimum image quality. Although the menu is simple, first-timers may find the choices daunting. One customer said it took many nights to dial in the ideal settings but believed it was well worth it. On the other side, the remote control is quite difficult to use as it lacks illuminated capability.

Because the W2700 is more forgiving out of the box, it is simpler to set up. The auto-keystone function became a favorite among those who frequently relocated the projector. Like the HT3550, the remote lacks backlighting, which is a lost chance for a gadget built for gloomy spaces.

Especially for novices, the W2700 is somewhat more user-friendly. The HT3550 thanks for your work with improved graphics if you are willing to spend more time on calibration.

Cost

Although both projectors are in the premium range, the W2700 is usually much less expensive. Users of the HT3550 typically justified the increased price with its better cinematic quality. Conversely, W2700 purchasers valued conserving some money while still receiving first-rate quality. One user noted that the W2700 appears to be a more affordable option if you're not an avid movie enthusiast.